Is Trump Planning To End The Fed???
— ModernShaman (@ModernShaman777) November 8, 2024
READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE:https://t.co/SPYB65hbTB
The Federal Reserve was created in secrecy in 1913, hidden in the shadows of Christmas when few were paying attention? This video dives deep into the history and the moral questions… pic.twitter.com/sdf0mLAJd8
The Federal Reserve and the Income Tax: Violations of Constitutional Freedoms and a Call for Change
In 1913, two major changes reshaped America’s financial landscape: the establishment of the Federal Reserve and the introduction of the federal income tax. These developments quietly took place as the country celebrated Christmas, marking a profound shift in how America was funded and governed. But before these changes, the nation thrived through a system of tariffs and excise taxes—a model that protected American industry while respecting individual freedoms.
How America Was Funded Before 1913
Before the income tax and the Federal Reserve, America was funded primarily through tariffs and excise taxes. These tariffs served multiple purposes: they generated revenue, encouraged domestic industry, and protected American workers from unfair foreign competition. By funding itself through tariffs, the government did not need to intrude upon the financial privacy of its citizens, leaving individuals free from obligations to report their income or risk criminal consequences.
Tariffs were the primary method of funding for nearly 150 years, covering the costs of government while respecting individual sovereignty and privacy. Tariffs taxed goods as they entered the country, not the labor or income of its citizens. This model avoided intruding on personal financial information, making it a system that did not infringe upon individual privacy or Constitutional protections.
Donald Trump’s Call to Return to Tariffs
In recent years, former President Donald Trump has publicly suggested reintroducing tariffs as a funding mechanism. Trump’s push to bring back tariffs as a central economic policy is a return to America’s origins—when the nation’s economy was protected from global exploitation, and the government did not rely on taxing labor or income.
By reintroducing tariffs, Trump argues that America can reduce or eliminate the income tax, restore financial privacy, and generate revenue in a way that supports American businesses. Such a change could be seen as a move toward economic freedom, as it shifts the tax burden away from citizens’ earnings and back to imported goods.
The Income Tax: A Violation of Constitutional Rights
The 16th Amendment, which enabled the federal income tax, has long been contested. Some argue it was never properly ratified by the states, while others believe it fundamentally violates multiple constitutional protections. Here’s a breakdown of how the income tax infringes upon basic rights enshrined in the Constitution:
-
Fourth Amendment Violation (Right to Privacy):
The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from “unreasonable searches and seizures.” By mandating that individuals disclose their personal financial information to the government, the income tax effectively overrides this right. The government demands full transparency into the private details of one’s earnings, savings, and expenditures. This intrusion into personal financial records would otherwise be considered an unreasonable search. -
Fifth Amendment Violation (Right Against Self-Incrimination):
The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no individual should be compelled to testify against themselves. However, under the current tax system, individuals must disclose their financial activities in detail or face penalties. Any misreporting, even unintentional, can lead to legal consequences, effectively forcing people to incriminate themselves. This runs counter to the spirit of the Fifth Amendment, as it compels individuals to submit potentially self-incriminating information to the government. -
Violation of the Right to Life, Liberty, and Property:
The Constitution’s core principles assert the right to “life, liberty, and property.” By taking a portion of citizens’ income through taxation, the government encroaches on their liberty and their right to the property they’ve earned through labor. The income tax, in this sense, can be seen as a system of enforced servitude, where individuals are required to surrender part of their labor and earnings. -
Potential Violation of the Tenth Amendment (States’ Rights):
The Tenth Amendment states that powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states or the people. Critics of the income tax argue that it exceeds the powers intended for the federal government, infringing upon states’ rights and the freedom of the individual. By imposing taxes on individual income, the government exercises a level of control over personal finances that the Constitution does not explicitly grant.
A Call to Reclaim Financial Freedom and Constitutional Rights
The Federal Reserve and income tax have reshaped America’s economy in ways that impact every citizen, fundamentally altering the relationship between individuals and government. As more people become aware of the constitutional implications of income taxation, the idea of returning to tariffs is gaining traction. A system based on tariffs would align with America’s foundational values, allowing the government to generate revenue without infringing on personal freedoms.
Donald Trump’s proposal to shift back to tariffs could represent a significant step toward restoring financial freedom and privacy. If we move away from taxing labor and focus instead on tariffs, we could reduce the intrusive, unconstitutional requirements of the current tax system and bring us closer to the ideals of individual liberty and privacy that the Founders envisioned.
A Final Thought: What Right Does Any Entity Have Over Your Labor?
At its heart, this issue isn’t only about money; it’s about freedom. What right does any institution have to claim a portion of the labor that is yours by natural law? The idea that someone can demand a portion of your labor in exchange for your freedom is a moral question as much as a legal one. When the government claims the right to tax your income, it effectively claims partial ownership over your time, your efforts, and your life. If we are to remain a free people, we must carefully examine these structures and consider how they align with our values of freedom, privacy, and autonomy.
